lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 0/3] gpiolib: Get rid of gpio_free_array()/gpio_request_array()
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:47:58PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:14 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:36:18PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 2:51 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > There are only two users left of the gpio_free_array()/gpio_request_array().
> > > > Convert them to very basic legacy APIs (it requires much less work for
> > > > now) and drop no more used gpio_free_array()/gpio_request_array().
> > >
> > > That's reasonable and makes the kernel a better place.
> > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Bart, do you want me to take it via my tree or you want to take directly?
>
> We don't have Acks from the relevant arch maintainers yet.

True. But I haven't noticed much maintainer's activity WRT PXA code.
I dunno who can be the best to Ack these. Arnd?

> I can pick it up but I won't do it before the end of the merge window anyway.

Sure.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 15:49    [W:0.404 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site