lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 07/10] perf: Define common uncore capabilities
From
On 2024-03-13 11:23 am, James Clark wrote:
>
>
> On 12/03/2024 17:34, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> Nearly all uncore/system PMUs share a common set of capbilities,
>> so let's wrap those up in a single macro for ease of use.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/perf_event.h | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
>> index b1fd832ed8bf..5d5db122005b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
>> @@ -293,6 +293,9 @@ struct perf_event_pmu_context;
>> #define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE 0x0100
>> #define PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_COMMON_EVENTS 0x0200
>>
>> +#define PERF_PMU_UNCORE_CAPS \
>> +(PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_SAMPLING| PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE | PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_COMMON_EVENTS)
>> +
>
> The most minor of nits: missing space before |. There is another one in
> another commit that triggers checkpatch but that line gets deleted anyway.

Bleh, thanks for the catch. And it seems that wasn't the only thing I
inexplicably managed to mess up in the rename patch either... All fixed
locally now.

Cheers,
Robin.

>
>> struct perf_output_handle;
>>
>> #define PMU_NULL_DEV ((void *)(~0UL))

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-03-13 13:24    [W:0.039 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site