Messages in this thread | | | From | 梦龙董 <> | Date | Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:14:03 +0800 | Subject | Re: [External] Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/9] libbpf: add support for the multi-link of tracing |
| |
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:12 AM Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 7:44 PM 梦龙董 <dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 9:56 AM Alexei Starovoitov > > <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 2:35 AM Menglong Dong > > > <dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com> wrote: [...] > > > Pls use glob_match the way [ku]probe multi are doing > > > instead of exact match. > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm a little suspecting the effect of glob_match. I seldom found > > the use case that the kernel functions which we want to trace > > have the same naming pattern. And the exact match seems more > > useful. > > > > Can we use both exact and glob match here? > > exact is a subset of glob_match. > Pls follow the pattern that[ku]probe multi established > in terms of user interface expectations.
Okay!
| |