lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectKunit test failures with cpumask tests on parisc
Hi,

when running cpumask Kunit tests on parisc/parisc64 in qemu,
I get the following errors.

KTAP version 1
# Subtest: cpumask
# module: cpumask_kunit
1..6
# test_cpumask_weight: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/cpumask_kunit.c:68
Expected nr_cpu_ids == cpumask_weight(((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask)), but
nr_cpu_ids == 16 (0x10)
cpumask_weight(((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask)) == 1 (0x1)
cpu_possible_mask contains CPUs 0
not ok 1 test_cpumask_weight
# test_cpumask_first: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/cpumask_kunit.c:79
Expected nr_cpu_ids <= cpumask_first_zero(((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask)), but
nr_cpu_ids == 16 (0x10)
cpumask_first_zero(((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask)) == 1 (0x1)
cpu_possible_mask contains CPUs 0
not ok 2 test_cpumask_first
# test_cpumask_last: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/cpumask_kunit.c:87
Expected nr_cpu_ids - 1 == cpumask_last(((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask)), but
nr_cpu_ids - 1 == 15 (0xf)
cpumask_last(((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask)) == 0 (0x0)
cpu_possible_mask contains CPUs 0
not ok 3 test_cpumask_last
# test_cpumask_next: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/cpumask_kunit.c:94
Expected nr_cpu_ids <= cpumask_next_zero(-1, ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask)), but
nr_cpu_ids == 16 (0x10)
cpumask_next_zero(-1, ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask)) == 1 (0x1)
cpu_possible_mask contains CPUs 0
not ok 4 test_cpumask_next
ok 5 test_cpumask_iterators
ok 6 test_cpumask_iterators_builtin
# cpumask: pass:2 fail:4 skip:0 total:6
# Totals: pass:2 fail:4 skip:0 total:6
not ok 5 cpumask

It appears that parisc sets __cpu_possible_mask to the number of online CPUs,
which is limited in qemu and doesn't match CONFIG_NR_CPUS. Is this a problem
with the unit test or with the parisc architecture, or does the unit test
simply not apply for parisc ?

Thanks,
Guenter

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-02-05 07:53    [W:0.061 / U:0.580 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site