lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Feb]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: CVE-2023-52437: Revert "md/raid5: Wait for MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING in raid5d"
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 7:05 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 06:32:03AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 02:31:06PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > So if the reply-to points to LKML + the subsystem mailing
> > > list for the maintainers + a new ML for the security folks (and these three
> > > are also CC'd on the announcements, at least the last two), that would be
> > > nice to have. I can work on patches to vulns.git, for example to integrate
> > > with get_maintainer.pl, if you ack the idea.
> >
> > That might be a bit noisy, for some commits, but sure, I can see the
> > value in being notified about a CVE for my subsystem. If you have a
> > specific 'get_maintainer.pl' command line invocation you think would be
> > good, I can easily add it to the scripts.
>
> Would:
> --no-keywords --no-git --no-git-fallback --norolestats --nol
>
> be a good pattern to follow?

I would include lists as well. it would be nice to exclude
reviewed-bys but that's not easy to do in get_maintainer.pI

Paolo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 15:28    [W:0.049 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site