Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:43:25 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 06/18] mm: Tidy up pte_next_pfn() definition | From | David Hildenbrand <> |
| |
On 15.02.24 11:31, Ryan Roberts wrote: > Now that the all architecture overrides of pte_next_pfn() have been > replaced with pte_advance_pfn(), we can simplify the definition of the > generic pte_next_pfn() macro so that it is unconditionally defined. > > Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> > --- > include/linux/pgtable.h | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h > index b7ac8358f2aa..bc005d84f764 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h > +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h > @@ -212,7 +212,6 @@ static inline int pmd_dirty(pmd_t pmd) > #define arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() do {} while (0) > #endif > > -#ifndef pte_next_pfn > #ifndef pte_advance_pfn > static inline pte_t pte_advance_pfn(pte_t pte, unsigned long nr) > { > @@ -221,7 +220,6 @@ static inline pte_t pte_advance_pfn(pte_t pte, unsigned long nr) > #endif > > #define pte_next_pfn(pte) pte_advance_pfn(pte, 1) > -#endif > > #ifndef set_ptes > /**
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
-- Cheers,
David / dhildenb
| |