On 03/12/2024 15:58, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 12/2/24 16:07, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>> @@ -286,6 +292,31 @@ struct ovpn_peer *ovpn_peer_get_by_dst(struct ovpn_priv *ovpn,
>>   	return peer;
>>   }
>> 
>> +/**
>> + * ovpn_peer_check_by_src - check that skb source is routed via peer
>> + * @ovpn: the openvpn instance to search
>> + * @skb: the packet to extract source address from
>> + * @peer: the peer to check against the source address
>> + *
>> + * Return: true if the peer is matching or false otherwise
>> + */
>> +bool ovpn_peer_check_by_src(struct ovpn_priv *ovpn, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> +			    struct ovpn_peer *peer)
>> +{
>> +	bool match = false;
>> +
>> +	if (ovpn->mode == OVPN_MODE_P2P) {
>> +		/* in P2P mode, no matter the destination, packets are always
>> +		 * sent to the single peer listening on the other side
>> +		 */
>> +		rcu_read_lock();
>> +		match = (peer == rcu_dereference(ovpn->peer));
>> +		rcu_read_unlock();
> 
> Here you are not dereferencing ovpn->peer, so you can use
> rcu_access_pointer() instead and avoid the rcu_read_lock/unlock() pair.

I see - thanks for pointing this out!
Will switch to rcu_access_pointer().

Regards,

-- 
Antonio Quartulli
OpenVPN Inc.