Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Date | Wed, 3 Jan 2024 12:54:07 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/36] Remove UCLINUX from LTP |
| |
Hi Petr,
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 12:50 PM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 2:52 AM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote: > > > UCLINUX is broken in LTP and nobody really cares. Actually I dare to > > > say UCLINUX is dead. Therefore I prepared patchset to remove UCLINUX > > > from LTP. We have been actively removing UCLINUX from LTP during rewrite > > > tests to new LTP API. This removes the rest from the old tests (which > > > will be sooner or later rewritten to new API). > > > > Because the patchset is quite big, I did not want to send it to mailing > > > lists (but I can do it if you want). > > > > Can you please have look at my fork on gitlab, branch: remove-UCLINUX > > > https://gitlab.com/pevik/ltp/-/commits/remove-UCLINUX?ref_type=heads > > > > Build test: > > > https://github.com/pevik/ltp/actions/runs/7392470215 > > > Thanks for your series! > > Thank you for your feedback. May I add your Acked-by: tag to the series when we > agree to merge?
I am not sure I agree with this series. Removing support for UCLINUX from LTP is almost a guarantee for not noticing when more breakage is introduced.
How exactly is UCLINUX broken in LTP?
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |