lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v2 4/6] pinctrl: Implementation of the generic scmi-pinctrl driver
Date
Hi Linus,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] pinctrl: Implementation of the generic scmi-
> pinctrl driver
>
> Hi Peng,
>
> thanks for your patch!
>
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 11:45 AM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> >
> > scmi-pinctrl driver implements pinctrl driver interface and using SCMI
> > protocol to redirect messages from pinctrl subsystem SDK to SCMI
> > platform firmware, which does the changes in HW.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@epam.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@epam.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> (...)
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > + .dt_node_to_map = pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_all,
> > + .dt_free_map = pinconf_generic_dt_free_map, #endif
>
> This looks like with !OF the driver becomes pretty unusable doesn't it?
>
> Should we just depend on OF in Kconfig or are there already plans for ACPI or
> similar?

I not have platforms that has ACPI support. Cristian, Sudeep do you have
plans?

I could add depends on OF in V4, since current patch version is
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240121-pinctrl-scmi-v3-4-8d94ba79dca8@nxp.com/

or I could use a follow up patch after V4 patch 1-4 applied.

Would you ACK the current V3 patch or wait I add OF dependency?

Thanks,
Peng.

>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-05-27 14:37    [W:0.055 / U:2.604 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site