Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:43:59 +0800 | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/8] clk: qcom: support for duplicate freq in RCG2 freq table | | From | Ziyang Huang <> |
| |
在 2024/1/23 1:34, Andrew Lunn 写道: >>>> Change-Id: I97d9e1b55d8f3ee095f6f01729af527ba90e50e5 >>>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> >>>> (cherry picked from commit 775e7d3b69ffc97afb5bd5a6c9c423f2f4d8a0b2) >>>> Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <ipkumar@codeaurora.org> >>>> >>>> Change-Id: If10193fc79a3c1375ab73597813745ff1f4df0ad >>>> >>>> Pick from https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/qsdk/oss/kernel/linux-ipq-5.4/-/commit/6dfb368bae130bee58e00ddf8330b55066e1c8c5 >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Huang <hzyitc@outlook.com> >>> >>> Please clean up these tags. These Change-ID tags are meaningless in >>> mainline. 775e7d3b69ffc97afb5bd5a6c9c423f2f4d8a0b2 is not in mainline >>> either. The picked from might be interesting, but please put it into >>> the body of the commit message, not mixed in with the tags. >>> >>> Who actually wrote this patch? The first Signed-off-by: is from >>> Abhishek Sahu. But you have a From of Praveenkumar I ? >> >> I have no idea about this. This patch is from Qualcomm vendor linux code. > > O.K. Since this is direct from the vendor, who probably does not track > code authorship correctly, i would say the author in git is probably > wrong. I would set the author: to Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org>. > >> What's more, I don't known how to deal with these commit message since I'm >> not the author and I'm not sure do I have right to edit them even though >> this is GPL code. > > You should keep all the Signed-off-by, in the order they are. But the > Change-Id is meaningless, so there is no problem removing them. > > Andrew
These days, I known a new knowledge: SGMII+ only support 2.5G. 1000M can't work with SGMII+ mode. So the 1000M frequency divided from 3.125G can be dropped. Then we don't have duplicated frequency and this patch is unnecessary. Will test my guess.
|  |