Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Aug 2023 14:13:38 +0800 | From | Alina Yu <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: rtq2208: Add Richtek RTQ2208 SubPMIC |
| |
Hi Krzysztof,
On Sat, Aug 05, 2023 at 11:27:00PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 03/08/2023 08:36, ChiYuan Huang wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 03:13:11PM +0800, Alina Yu wrote: > >> Add bindings for Richtek RTQ2208 IC controlled SubPMIC > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Alina Yu <alina_yu@richtek.com> > > > >> + > >> + richtek,mtp-sel-high: > >> + type: boolean > >> + description: > >> + vout register selection based on this boolean value. > >> + false - Using DVS0 register setting to adjust vout > >> + true - Using DVS1 register setting to adjust vout > >> + > >> + regulators: > >> + type: object > > Just curious. > > It seems this PMIC only support buck/ldo ouput. > > Since Krzysztof already reviewed it, not sure whether to group it into one node is common or not. > > AFAIK, if there's no more function included, to put all on the top level may be better. > >> + > > Indeed we tend to avoid empty nodes just as a corresponding part to > Linux device. > > Here, I don't know Rob's and Conor's opinion, but for cases of having > more than 2 regulators, having "regulators" node makes sense to me - > nicely organizes that piece of DT which can grow quite big. I can also > live without the "regulators" node. >
Thank you for your kind advice. I will keep regulator node in v7
Best regards, Alina
| |