Messages in this thread | | | From | James Hilliard <> | Date | Mon, 7 Aug 2023 10:03:45 -0600 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add VAR-SOM-MX6 SoM with Custom Board |
| |
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 12:26 PM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 06:37:39AM -0600, James Hilliard wrote: > > Add support for Variscite i.MX6Q VAR-SOM-MX6 SoM with Custom Board. > > > > Cc: Pierluigi Passaro <pierluigi.p@variscite.com> > > Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > index 2510eaa8906d..76bb098605e7 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > @@ -385,6 +385,12 @@ properties: > > - const: toradex,apalis_imx6q > > - const: fsl,imx6q > > > > + - description: i.MX6Q Variscite VAR-SOM-MX6 Boards > > + items: > > + - const: variscite,mx6customboard > > + - const: variscite,var-som-imx6q > > + - const: fsl,imx6q > > I find it hard to tell what the sort order here is meant to be, but it > appears to be first by what I.MX processor and then by the board > compatibles? If so, this is added out of order.
Ordering follows the same pattern as say the "Variscite VAR-SOM-MX8MM based boards", should it be different?
> > > + > > - description: TQ-Systems TQMa6Q SoM (variant A) on MBa6x > > items: > > - const: tq,imx6q-mba6x-a > > -- > > 2.34.1 > >
| |