lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/9] phy: qcom: uniphy: Update UNIPHY driver to be a common driver
From

On 8/29/2023 8:07 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 at 17:00, Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@quicinc.com> wrote:
>> This patch updates the UNIPHY driver to be a common driver to
>> accommodate all UNIPHY / Combo PHY. This driver can be used for
>> both USB and PCIe UNIPHY. Using phy-mul-sel from DTS MUX selection
>> for USB / PCIe can be acheived.
> I'm not sure why you are talking about PCIe here. This patch adds only
> SS PHY support.
>
> Also, I'd like to point out that we had this 'USB and PCIe and
> everything else' design in the QMP driver. We had to split the driver
> into individual pieces to make it manageable again.
This Uniphy 22ull is a combo PHY used between USB GEN3 or PCIe GEN3. Via
mux selection
the one of the controller interface can use it. Hence thought to have a
same PHY driver for
both USB3 and PCIe. Will drop the plan of adding the PCIe support.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-uniphy.c | 401 +++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 335 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-uniphy.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-uniphy.c
>> index da6f290af722..eb71588f5417 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-uniphy.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-uniphy.c
>> @@ -5,141 +5,410 @@
>> * Based on code from
>> * Allwinner Technology Co., Ltd. <www.allwinnertech.com>
>> *
>> + * Modified the driver to be common for Qualcomm UNIPHYs
>> + * Copyright (c) 2023, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> I'd not call this 'modified', but rather 'rewritten from scratch.
Sure, will correct.
>
>> */
>>
>> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>> #include <linux/err.h>
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>> #include <linux/reset.h>
>>
>> -struct ipq4019_usb_phy {
>> +struct uniphy_init_tbl {
>> + unsigned int offset;
>> + unsigned int val;
>> +};
> unused
>
>> +
>> +#define UNIPHY_INIT_CFG(o, v) \
>> + { \
>> + .offset = o, \
>> + .val = v, \
>> + }
> unused
>
>> +
>> +struct uniphy_cfg {
>> + const struct uniphy_init_tbl *init_seq;
>> + int num_init_seq;
>> + const char * const *clk_list;
>> + int num_clks;
>> + const char * const *reset_list;
>> + int num_resets;
>> + const char * const *vreg_list;
>> + int num_vregs;
>> + unsigned int pipe_clk_rate;
>> + unsigned int reset_udelay;
>> + unsigned int autoload_udelay;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct qcom_uniphy {
>> struct device *dev;
>> + const struct uniphy_cfg *cfg;
>> struct phy *phy;
>> void __iomem *base;
>> - struct reset_control *por_rst;
>> - struct reset_control *srif_rst;
>> + struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
>> + struct reset_control_bulk_data *resets;
>> + struct regulator_bulk_data *vregs;
>> + struct clk_fixed_rate pipe_clk_fixed;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const char * const ipq4019_ssphy_reset_l[] = {
>> + "por_rst",
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct uniphy_cfg ipq4019_usb_ssphy_cfg = {
>> + .reset_list = ipq4019_ssphy_reset_l,
>> + .num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(ipq4019_ssphy_reset_l),
>> + .reset_udelay = 10000,
>> +
>> };
>>
>> -static int ipq4019_ss_phy_power_off(struct phy *_phy)
>> +static const char * const ipq4019_hsphy_reset_l[] = {
>> + "por_rst", "srif_rst",
>> +};
> +
>> +static const struct uniphy_cfg ipq4019_usb_hsphy_cfg = {
>> + .reset_list = ipq4019_hsphy_reset_l,
>> + .num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(ipq4019_hsphy_reset_l),
>> + .reset_udelay = 10000,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int phy_mux_sel(struct phy *phy)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_uniphy *uniphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>> + struct device *dev = uniphy->dev;
>> + struct regmap *tcsr;
>> + unsigned int args[2];
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + tcsr = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args(dev->of_node, "qcom,phy-mux-sel",
>> + ARRAY_SIZE(args), args);
> No. mux data should come from match_data rather than polluting DT with it.
>
>> + if (IS_ERR(tcsr)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(tcsr);
>> + if (ret == -ENOENT)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to lookup syscon for phy mux %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* PHY MUX registers only have this BIT0 */
> huh?
>
>> + ret = regmap_write(tcsr, args[0], args[1]);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "PHY Mux selection failed: %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int uniphy_enable(struct phy *phy)
>> {
>> - struct ipq4019_usb_phy *phy = phy_get_drvdata(_phy);
>> + struct qcom_uniphy *uniphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>> + const struct uniphy_cfg *cfg = uniphy->cfg;
>> + const struct uniphy_init_tbl *tbl;
>> + void __iomem *base = uniphy->base;
>> + int i, ret;
>>
>> - reset_control_assert(phy->por_rst);
>> - msleep(10);
>> + ret = regulator_bulk_enable(cfg->num_vregs, uniphy->vregs);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(uniphy->dev, "failed to enable regulators: %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Assert all available resets */
>> + for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_resets; i++) {
>> + ret = reset_control_assert(uniphy->resets[i].rstc);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(uniphy->dev, "reset assert failed: %d\n", ret);
>> + goto err_assert_reset;
>> + }
>> + if (cfg->reset_udelay)
>> + usleep_range(cfg->reset_udelay, cfg->reset_udelay + 10);
>> + }
> There is a whole reset_control_bulk_*() set of API. Please use it
> instead of hardcoding reset cycles.
>
>> +
>> + /* Deassert all available resets */
>> + for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_resets; i++) {
>> + ret = reset_control_deassert(uniphy->resets[i].rstc);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(uniphy->dev, "reset deassert failed: %d\n", ret);
>> + goto err_assert_reset;
>> + }
>> + if (cfg->reset_udelay)
>> + usleep_range(cfg->reset_udelay, cfg->reset_udelay + 10);
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = phy_mux_sel(phy);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto err_assert_reset;
>> +
>> + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(cfg->num_clks, uniphy->clks);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(uniphy->dev, "failed to enable clocks: %d\n", ret);
>> + goto err_assert_reset;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (cfg->autoload_udelay)
>> + usleep_range(cfg->autoload_udelay, cfg->autoload_udelay + 10);
>> +
>> + if (cfg->num_init_seq) {
>> + tbl = cfg->init_seq;
>> + for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_init_seq; i++, tbl++)
>> + writel(tbl->val, base + tbl->offset);
>> + }
> unused
>
>> return 0;
>> +
>> +err_assert_reset:
>> + /* Assert all available resets */
>> + for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_resets; i++) {
>> + reset_control_assert(uniphy->resets[i].rstc);
>> + if (cfg->reset_udelay)
>> + usleep_range(cfg->reset_udelay, cfg->reset_udelay + 10);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static int ipq4019_ss_phy_power_on(struct phy *_phy)
>> +static int uniphy_disable(struct phy *phy)
>> {
>> - struct ipq4019_usb_phy *phy = phy_get_drvdata(_phy);
>> + struct qcom_uniphy *uniphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>> + const struct uniphy_cfg *cfg = uniphy->cfg;
>> + int i;
>>
>> - ipq4019_ss_phy_power_off(_phy);
>> + /* Assert all available resets */
>> + for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_resets; i++) {
>> + reset_control_assert(uniphy->resets[i].rstc);
>> + if (cfg->reset_udelay)
>> + usleep_range(cfg->reset_udelay, cfg->reset_udelay + 10);
>> + }
>>
>> - reset_control_deassert(phy->por_rst);
>> + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(cfg->num_clks, uniphy->clks);
>> +
>> + regulator_bulk_disable(cfg->num_vregs, uniphy->vregs);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static const struct phy_ops ipq4019_usb_ss_phy_ops = {
>> - .power_on = ipq4019_ss_phy_power_on,
>> - .power_off = ipq4019_ss_phy_power_off,
>> +static const struct phy_ops uniphy_phy_ops = {
>> + .power_on = uniphy_enable,
>> + .power_off = uniphy_disable,
> Using _enable / _disable for power_on() and power_off() isn't logical.
>
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> };
>>
>> -static int ipq4019_hs_phy_power_off(struct phy *_phy)
>> +static int qcom_uniphy_vreg_init(struct qcom_uniphy *uniphy)
>> +{
>> + const struct uniphy_cfg *cfg = uniphy->cfg;
>> + struct device *dev = uniphy->dev;
>> + int i, ret;
>> +
>> + uniphy->vregs = devm_kcalloc(dev, cfg->num_vregs,
>> + sizeof(*uniphy->vregs), GFP_KERNEL);
> You know the maximum amount of regulators. Can you use an array
> instead of allocating data?
>
>> + if (!uniphy->vregs)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_vregs; i++)
>> + uniphy->vregs[i].supply = cfg->vreg_list[i];
>> +
>> + ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(dev, cfg->num_vregs, uniphy->vregs);
>> +
> Drop empty lines between ret assignment and check.
>
>> + if (ret)
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get regulators\n");
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_uniphy_reset_init(struct qcom_uniphy *uniphy)
>> {
>> - struct ipq4019_usb_phy *phy = phy_get_drvdata(_phy);
>> + const struct uniphy_cfg *cfg = uniphy->cfg;
>> + struct device *dev = uniphy->dev;
>> + int i, ret;
>> +
>> + uniphy->resets = devm_kcalloc(dev, cfg->num_resets,
>> + sizeof(*uniphy->resets), GFP_KERNEL);
> Same here, can you use an array?
>
>> + if (!uniphy->resets)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - reset_control_assert(phy->por_rst);
>> - msleep(10);
>> + for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_resets; i++)
>> + uniphy->resets[i].id = cfg->reset_list[i];
> Declare common resets list and use
> devm_reset_control_bulk_get_optional_exclusive().
>
>> - reset_control_assert(phy->srif_rst);
>> - msleep(10);
>> + ret = devm_reset_control_bulk_get_exclusive(dev, cfg->num_resets, uniphy->resets);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get resets\n");
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static int ipq4019_hs_phy_power_on(struct phy *_phy)
>> +static int qcom_uniphy_clk_init(struct qcom_uniphy *uniphy)
> I don't see clocks actually being used. Please do not introduce unused features.
>
>> {
>> - struct ipq4019_usb_phy *phy = phy_get_drvdata(_phy);
>> + const struct uniphy_cfg *cfg = uniphy->cfg;
>> + struct device *dev = uniphy->dev;
>> + int i, ret;
>>
>> - ipq4019_hs_phy_power_off(_phy);
>>
>> - reset_control_deassert(phy->srif_rst);
>> - msleep(10);
>> + uniphy->clks = devm_kcalloc(dev, cfg->num_clks,
>> + sizeof(*uniphy->clks), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!uniphy->clks)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_clks; i++)
>> + uniphy->clks[i].id = cfg->clk_list[i];
>>
>> - reset_control_deassert(phy->por_rst);
>> + ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, cfg->num_clks, uniphy->clks);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get clocks\n");
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static const struct phy_ops ipq4019_usb_hs_phy_ops = {
>> - .power_on = ipq4019_hs_phy_power_on,
>> - .power_off = ipq4019_hs_phy_power_off,
>> -};
>> +static void phy_clk_release_provider(void *res)
>> +{
>> + of_clk_del_provider(res);
>> +}
>>
>> -static const struct of_device_id ipq4019_usb_phy_of_match[] = {
>> - { .compatible = "qcom,usb-hs-ipq4019-phy", .data = &ipq4019_usb_hs_phy_ops},
>> - { .compatible = "qcom,usb-ss-ipq4019-phy", .data = &ipq4019_usb_ss_phy_ops},
>> - { },
>> -};
>> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ipq4019_usb_phy_of_match);
>> +/*
>> + * Register a fixed rate pipe clock.
>> + *
>> + * The <s>_pipe_clksrc generated by PHY goes to the GCC that gate
>> + * controls it. The <s>_pipe_clk coming out of the GCC is requested
>> + * by the PHY driver for its operations.
>> + * We register the <s>_pipe_clksrc here. The gcc driver takes care
>> + * of assigning this <s>_pipe_clksrc as parent to <s>_pipe_clk.
>> + * Below picture shows this relationship.
>> + *
>> + * +---------------+
>> + * | PHY block |<<---------------------------------------+
>> + * | | |
>> + * | +-------+ | +-----+ |
>> + * I/P---^-->| PLL |---^--->pipe_clksrc--->| GCC |--->pipe_clk---+
>> + * clk | +-------+ | +-----+
>> + * +---------------+
>> + */
>> +static int phy_pipe_clk_register(struct qcom_uniphy *uniphy, struct device_node *np)
>> +{
>> + struct clk_fixed_rate *fixed = &uniphy->pipe_clk_fixed;
>> + const struct uniphy_cfg *cfg = uniphy->cfg;
>> + struct device *dev = uniphy->dev;
>> + struct clk_init_data init = { };
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_string(np, "clock-output-names", &init.name);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "%pOFn: No clock-output-names\n", np);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + init.ops = &clk_fixed_rate_ops;
>> +
>> + fixed->fixed_rate = cfg->pipe_clk_rate;
>> + fixed->hw.init = &init;
>>
>> -static int ipq4019_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> + ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &fixed->hw);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = of_clk_add_hw_provider(np, of_clk_hw_simple_get, &fixed->hw);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
> When you c&p something, please take care to understand the code you are copying.
> Unlike QMP drivers you can (and should) use devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider() here.
>
> Not to mention that pipe clocks are not in this patch.
>
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Roll a devm action because the clock provider is the child node, but
>> + * the child node is not actually a device.
>> + */
>> + return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, phy_clk_release_provider, np);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_uniphy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
>> - struct ipq4019_usb_phy *phy;
>> + struct qcom_uniphy *uniphy;
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> - phy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*phy), GFP_KERNEL);
>> - if (!phy)
>> + uniphy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*uniphy), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!uniphy)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - phy->dev = &pdev->dev;
>> - phy->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>> - if (IS_ERR(phy->base)) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "failed to remap register memory\n");
>> - return PTR_ERR(phy->base);
>> - }
>> + uniphy->dev = dev;
>>
>> - phy->por_rst = devm_reset_control_get(phy->dev, "por_rst");
>> - if (IS_ERR(phy->por_rst)) {
>> - if (PTR_ERR(phy->por_rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> - dev_err(dev, "POR reset is missing\n");
>> - return PTR_ERR(phy->por_rst);
>> + uniphy->cfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>> + if (!uniphy->cfg)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + uniphy->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>> + if (IS_ERR(uniphy->base)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(uniphy->base);
>> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to remap register memory\n");
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> - phy->srif_rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional(phy->dev, "srif_rst");
>> - if (IS_ERR(phy->srif_rst))
>> - return PTR_ERR(phy->srif_rst);
>> + ret = qcom_uniphy_clk_init(uniphy);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = qcom_uniphy_reset_init(uniphy);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = qcom_uniphy_vreg_init(uniphy);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (uniphy->cfg->pipe_clk_rate) {
>> + np = of_node_get(dev->of_node);
> What for? Do you think that the driver can outlive struct device?
>
>> + ret = phy_pipe_clk_register(uniphy, np);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to register pipe clk\n");
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> + }
>>
>> - phy->phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, of_device_get_match_data(dev));
>> - if (IS_ERR(phy->phy)) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "failed to create PHY\n");
>> - return PTR_ERR(phy->phy);
>> + uniphy->phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, &uniphy_phy_ops);
>> + if (IS_ERR(uniphy->phy)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(uniphy->phy);
>> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to create PHY\n");
>> + goto err;
>> }
>> - phy_set_drvdata(phy->phy, phy);
>> +
>> + phy_set_drvdata(uniphy->phy, uniphy);
>>
>> phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate);
>>
>> - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider);
>> + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider);
>> +
>> +err:
>> + if (uniphy->cfg->pipe_clk_rate)
>> + of_node_put(np);
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static struct platform_driver ipq4019_usb_phy_driver = {
>> - .probe = ipq4019_usb_phy_probe,
>> +static const struct of_device_id qcom_uniphy_of_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "qcom,usb-hs-ipq4019-phy", .data = &ipq4019_usb_hsphy_cfg},
>> + { .compatible = "qcom,usb-ss-ipq4019-phy", .data = &ipq4019_usb_ssphy_cfg},
>> + { },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_uniphy_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver qcom_uniphy_driver = {
>> + .probe = qcom_uniphy_probe,
>> .driver = {
>> - .of_match_table = ipq4019_usb_phy_of_match,
>> - .name = "ipq4019-usb-phy",
>> + .of_match_table = qcom_uniphy_of_match,
>> + .name = "qcom-uniphy",
>> }
>> };
>> -module_platform_driver(ipq4019_usb_phy_driver);
>> +module_platform_driver(qcom_uniphy_driver);
>>
>> -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QCOM/IPQ4019 USB phy driver");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QCOM uniphy driver");
>> MODULE_AUTHOR("John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>");
>> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> General comment: please consider dropping this beast and starting from
> scratch, adding only really necessary bits to the existing ipq4019 USB
> PHY driver.
Rewritten the entire driver considering the IPQ5332 as well and because
of it
there are unused code which are utilized in patch [8/9]. I should have
added only the IPQ4019
support alone in this patch and then incrementally update it for
IPQ5332. Will follow that here
onwards. Will address all the review comments.

- Praveenkumar

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-08-31 14:09    [W:3.162 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site