lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/4] net: dsa: hsr: Enable HSR HW offloading for KSZ9477
Hi Paolo,

> On Thu, 2023-08-31 at 13:18 +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > This patch series provides support for HSR HW offloading in KSZ9477
> > switch IC.
> >
> > To test this feature:
> > ip link add name hsr0 type hsr slave1 lan1 slave2 lan2 supervision
> > 45 version 1 ifconfig lan1 up;ifconfig lan2 up
> > ifconfig hsr0 192.168.0.1 up
> >
> > To remove HSR network device:
> > ip link del hsr0
> >
> > Test HW:
> > Two KSZ9477-EVB boards with HSR ports set to "Port1" and "Port2".
> >
> > Performance SW used:
> > nuttcp -S --nofork
> > nuttcp -vv -T 60 -r 192.168.0.2
> > nuttcp -vv -T 60 -t 192.168.0.2
> >
> > Code: v6.5-rc7 Linux repository
> > Tested HSR v0 and v1
> > Results:
> > With KSZ9477 offloading support added: RX: 100 Mbps TX: 98 Mbps
> > With no offloading RX: 63 Mbps TX: 63 Mbps
> >
> >
> > Lukasz Majewski (4):
> > net: dsa: Extend the ksz_device structure to hold info about HSR
> > ports net: dsa: Extend ksz9477 TAG setup to support HSR frames
> > duplication net: dsa: hsr: Enable in KSZ9477 switch HW HSR
> > offloading net: dsa: hsr: Provide generic HSR ksz_hsr_{join|leave}
> > functions
> >
> > drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c | 96
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.h |
> > 4 ++ drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c | 81
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.h | 3 +
> > include/linux/dsa/ksz_common.h | 1 +
> > net/dsa/tag_ksz.c | 5 ++
> > 6 files changed, 190 insertions(+)
> >
> I'm sorry, it looks like I was not clear previously.
> ---
> ## Form letter - net-next-closed
>
> The merge window for v6.6 has begun and therefore net-next is closed
> for new drivers, features, code refactoring and optimizations.
> We are currently accepting bug fixes only.
>
> Please repost when net-next reopens after Sept 11th.
>

This is in fact the RFC kind of patch, as you were the only one who
replied with feedback on it.

If possible - I would like to gain as much feedback as possible until
11.09, so this patch set could be applied then.

> RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.
>

Shall I send RFC again? Or is the above explanation enough to proceed
with review?

> See:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#development-cycle

Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

--

DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-08-31 13:55    [W:0.070 / U:1.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site