lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] firmware: Explicitly include correct DT includes
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:44:37AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
> of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
> As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
> "temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
> and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
> files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
> replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
> explicitly include the correct includes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/firmware/imx/imx-dsp.c | 1 -
> drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu-irq.c | 1 +
> drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu.c | 1 +
> drivers/firmware/mtk-adsp-ipc.c | 1 -
> drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c | 1 +
> drivers/firmware/scpi_pm_domain.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/firmware/stratix10-rsu.c | 1 -
> drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c | 3 +--
> drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c | 1 +
> 10 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Not sure about the other maintainers, but I usually pick up
firmware/tegra patches up through the Tegra tree and then they
ultimately go through ARM SoC.

Arnd, Olof, does it make sense for you guys to pick this up directly?

Thierry
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-07-21 17:16    [W:0.060 / U:0.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site