lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 00/38] New page table range API
From
Am 10.07.23 um 22:43 schrieb Matthew Wilcox (Oracle):
> This patchset changes the API used by the MM to set up page table entries.
> The four APIs are:
> set_ptes(mm, addr, ptep, pte, nr)
> update_mmu_cache_range(vma, addr, ptep, nr)
> flush_dcache_folio(folio)
> flush_icache_pages(vma, page, nr)
>
> flush_dcache_folio() isn't technically new, but no architecture
> implemented it, so I've done that for them. The old APIs remain around
> but are mostly implemented by calling the new interfaces.
>
> The new APIs are based around setting up N page table entries at once.
> The N entries belong to the same PMD, the same folio and the same VMA,
> so ptep++ is a legitimate operation, and locking is taken care of for
> you. Some architectures can do a better job of it than just a loop,
> but I have hesitated to make too deep a change to architectures I don't
> understand well.
>
> One thing I have changed in every architecture is that PG_arch_1 is now a
> per-folio bit instead of a per-page bit. This was something that would
> have to happen eventually, and it makes sense to do it now rather than
> iterate over every page involved in a cache flush and figure out if it
> needs to happen.

I think we do use PG_arch_1 on s390 for our secure page handling and
making this perf folio instead of physical page really seems wrong
and it probably breaks this code.

Claudio, can you have a look?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-07-11 11:07    [W:0.297 / U:0.380 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site