Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | From | "Huang, Kai" <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v11 11/20] x86/virt/tdx: Fill out TDMRs to cover all TDX memory regions | | Date | Mon, 12 Jun 2023 22:10:39 +0000 |
| |
On Mon, 2023-06-12 at 17:33 +0300, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 02:33:58AM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote: > > > > > > > > Maybe not even a pr_warn(), but something that's a bit ominous and has a > > > chance of getting users to act. > > > > Sorry I am not sure how to do. Could you give some suggestion? > > Maybe something like this would do? > > I'm struggle with the warning message. Any suggestion is welcome.
I guess it would be helpful to print out the actual consumed TDMRs?
pr_warn("consumed TDMRs reaching limit: %d used (out of %d)\n", tdmr_idx, tdmr_list->max_tdmrs);
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c > index 9cd4f6b58d4a..cc141025b249 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c > @@ -627,6 +627,15 @@ static int fill_out_tdmrs(struct list_head *tmb_list, > /* @tdmr_idx is always the index of last valid TDMR. */ > tdmr_list->nr_consumed_tdmrs = tdmr_idx + 1; > > + /* > + * Warn early that kernel is about to run out of TDMRs. > + * > + * This is indication that TDMR allocation has to be reworked to be > + * smarter to not run into an issue. > + */ > + if (tdmr_list->max_tdmrs - tdmr_list->nr_consumed_tdmrs < TDMR_NR_WARN) > + pr_warn("Low number of spare TDMRs\n"); > + > return 0; > } > > diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.h b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.h > index 323ce744b853..17efe33847ae 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.h > +++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.h > @@ -98,6 +98,9 @@ struct tdx_memblock { > int nid; > }; > > +/* Warn if kernel has less than TDMR_NR_WARN TDMRs after allocation */ > +#define TDMR_NR_WARN 4 > + > struct tdmr_info_list { > void *tdmrs; /* Flexible array to hold 'tdmr_info's */ > int nr_consumed_tdmrs; /* How many 'tdmr_info's are in use */
|  |