| From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | [PATCH v2 nolibc 46/53] selftests/nolibc: use INT_MAX instead of __INT_MAX__ | Date | Mon, 12 Jun 2023 13:45:07 -0700 |
| |
From: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
nolibc now has INT_MAX in stdint.h, so, don't mix INT_MAX and __INT_MAX__, unify them to INT_MAX.
Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org> Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c index 7d4b8d12050d..ff3da9539809 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c @@ -936,7 +936,7 @@ static const struct test test_names[] = { int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp) { int min = 0; - int max = __INT_MAX__; + int max = INT_MAX; int ret = 0; int err; int idx; @@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp) * here, which defaults to the full range. */ do { - min = 0; max = __INT_MAX__; + min = 0; max = INT_MAX; value = colon; if (value && *value) { colon = strchr(value, ':'); -- 2.40.1
|