lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 7/8] ARM: dts: stm32: adopt generic iio bindings for adc channels on dhcor-drc
From
Marek, Olivier

On 5/24/23 17:39, Olivier MOYSAN wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On 5/24/23 15:54, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 5/24/23 15:39, Olivier Moysan wrote:
>>> Use STM32 ADC generic bindings instead of legacy bindings on
>>> DHCOR DRC Compact board.
>>>
>>> The STM32 ADC specific binding to declare channels has been deprecated,
>>> hence adopt the generic IIO channels bindings, instead.
>>> The STM32MP151 device tree now exposes internal channels using the
>>> generic binding. This makes the change mandatory here to avoid a mixed
>>> use of legacy and generic binding, which is not supported by the driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@foss.st.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-drc-compact.dtsi    | 28 ++++++++++++++++---
>>>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-drc-compact.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-drc-compact.dtsi
>>> index 39af79dc654c..92d906bfd5d7 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-drc-compact.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-drc-compact.dtsi
>>> @@ -57,15 +57,35 @@ &adc {    /* X11 ADC inputs */
>>>       status = "okay";
>>>       adc1: adc@0 {
>>
>>
>> I sent similar patch recently too:
>>
>> [PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: Update to generic ADC channel binding on
>> DHSOM systems
>>
>> But I needed to add #address-cells/#size-cells here and to adc@100,
>> otherwise DTB checker was complaining . Did you run DTB check and was
>> it OK on your side ?
>
> The first patch in this serie adds the #address-cells/#size-cells to the
>  SoC DT. So, there is no need to add them later in the board DT.
>
> I can send a v2 with your patch (after removing the cells properties
> from the patch). Having all the patches in the same serie, will help
> avoiding sequencing problems.
>
> Do you agree with this ?

What is the status of this patch ?

Marek, I would prefer to take all ADC updates in this series if you agree.

Alex

>
> BRs
> Olivier
>
>>
>>> -        st,adc-channels = <0 1 6>;
>>> -        st,min-sample-time-nsecs = <5000>;
>>>           status = "okay";
>>> +        channel@0 {
>>> +            reg = <0>;
>>> +            st,min-sample-time-ns = <5000>;
>>> +        };
>>> +        channel@1 {
>>> +            reg = <1>;
>>> +            st,min-sample-time-ns = <5000>;
>>> +        };
>>> +        channel@6 {
>>> +            reg = <6>;
>>> +            st,min-sample-time-ns = <5000>;
>>> +        };
>>>       };
>>
>> [...]

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-05-30 10:00    [W:0.067 / U:0.660 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site