lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/9] perf/mem: AMD IBS and generic tools improvements
From
On 16-May-23 8:15 AM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> On 10-Apr-23 7:53 AM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>> On 08-Apr-23 3:14 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>> Hi Ravi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 4:25 AM Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Kernel IBS driver wasn't using new PERF_MEM_* APIs due to some of its
>>>> limitations. Mainly:
>>>>
>>>> 1. mem_lvl_num doesn't allow setting multiple sources whereas old API
>>>> allows it. Setting multiple data sources is useful because IBS on
>>>> pre-zen4 uarch doesn't provide fine granular DataSrc details (there
>>>> is only one such DataSrc(2h) though).
>>>> 2. perf mem sorting logic (sort__lvl_cmp()) ignores mem_lvl_num. perf
>>>> c2c (c2c_decode_stats()) does not use mem_lvl_num at all. perf mem
>>>> prints mem_lvl and mem_lvl_num both if both are set, which is ugly.
>>>>
>>>> Set mem_lvl_num, mem_remote and mem_hops for data_src via IBS. Handle
>>>> first issue using mem_lvl_num = ANY_CACHE | HOPS_0. In addition to
>>>> setting new API fields, convert all individual field assignments to
>>>> compile time wrapper macros built using PERF_MEM_S(). Also convert
>>>> DataSrc conditional code to array lookups.
>>>>
>>>> Interpretation of perf_mem_data_src by perf_mem__lvl_scnprintf() was
>>>> non-intuitive. Make it sane.
>>>
>>> Looks good, but I think you need to split kernel and user patches.
>>
>> Patch #1 to #3 are kernel changes. Patch #4 to #9 are userspace changes.
>> Arnaldo, Peter, please let me know if you wants to split the series and
>> resend.
>
> Hi Peter, tools/ patches are already upstream. Can you please pick up
> kernel changes.

Gentle ping, Peter!

Thanks,
Ravi

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-05-29 06:07    [W:0.124 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site