Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 26 May 2023 18:43:53 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] sched: Use fancy new guards |
| |
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 12:27:51PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Anyway, the naming is whack, but I don't have a proposed better name, > > except you might want to put "scope_" as the prefix not the suffix, but > > then that might look odd to, so who knows. > > FWIW C++ has std::scoped_lock. So perhaps using a similar wording may help ?
Yeah, C++ is a lot more flexible than CPP crazies. But yeah, happy to change it that way.
| |