Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 26 May 2023 09:24:56 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH V8 0/7] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Support variable clocking | From | Neil Armstrong <> |
| |
On 26/05/2023 09:22, Neil Armstrong wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 25 May 2023 22:05:52 -0500, Adam Ford wrote: >> This series fixes the blanking pack size and the PMS calculation. It then >> adds support to allows the DSIM to dynamically DPHY clocks, and support >> non-burst mode while allowing the removal of the hard-coded clock values >> for the PLL for imx8m mini/nano/plus, and it allows the removal of the >> burst-clock device tree entry when burst-mode isn't supported by connected >> devices like an HDMI brige. In that event, the HS clock is set to the >> value requested by the bridge chip. >> >> [...] > > Thanks, Applied to https://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/drm/drm-misc.git (drm-misc-next) > > [1/7] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: fix blanking packet size calculation > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/commit/?id=a617b33f7e513f25becf843bc97f8f1658c16337 > [2/7] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Fix PMS Calculator on imx8m[mnp] > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/commit/?id=54f1a83c72250b182fa7722b0c5f6eb5e769598d > [3/7] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Fetch pll-clock-frequency automatically > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/commit/?id=33d8d14c83bf67aa0d262961a6fda9c40f3c1052 > [4/7] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Select GENERIC_PHY_MIPI_DPHY > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/commit/?id=171b3b1e0f8b8c894f2388e1cf765a56f831ee5e > [5/7] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Dynamically configure DPHY timing > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/commit/?id=89691775f5735fca9dc40e119edcbb52a25b9612 > [6/7] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Support non-burst mode > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/commit/?id=bb0e13b9e223b218c9f242f8d340a332b4381042 > [7/7] dt-bindings: bridge: samsung-dsim: Make some flags optional > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/commit/?id=cfaf76d349837f695c8aa6d7077847fec4231fe5 >
OK I made a bad manipulation, I applied patch 7 without review... I'll send a revert patch.
Neil
| |