Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 25 May 2023 18:15:13 +0200 | From | neil.armstrong@linaro ... | Subject | Re: [PATCH V7 0/6] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Support variable clocking |
| |
On 25/05/2023 17:57, Adam Ford wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:39 AM Neil Armstrong > <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> On 24/05/2023 14:49, Adam Ford wrote: >>> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 7:45 AM Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Adam, >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 8:49 PM Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Inki, >>>>> >>>>> I haven't heard back from you on whether or not you want the bindings >>>>> patch to be included with me resending the series as V7 or if you're >>>>> OK with a single, stand-alone patch. >>>>> Will you let me know? I have the patch standing by waiting for >>>>> instructions. If you're not the right person to ask, please let me >>>>> know who the right person is. >>>> >>>> Neil has also been collecting samsung-dsim patches. Maybe he can clarify. >>> >>> If it matters, my preference all along was to do the bindings as a >>> separate thing once the driver updates were merged into the tree. >>> Since the bindings can be done in different ways, I was hoping to have >>> a separate discussion on the right way to do the bindings. If they >>> need to be part of the series, I can do that. >> >> If you don't introduce compatibles, no need to send bindings, it can >> be send separately. > > This series doesn't change any compatibility. > >> >> Can I apply this serie and 20230503163313.2640898-2-frieder@fris.de ? seems all has been reviewed. > > Looking at the driver, it looks like linux-next has some newer > features added into the driver since I started, so this series might > need a re-base. If that's the case, let me know, and I'll do the > re-base.
Ok I'll pull the other bits and let you know if this one needs a rebase.
Neil
> > adam > >> >> Neil >> >>> >>> adam >>
| |