lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: x86: Keep a per-VM MTRR state
From
On 5/25/2023 11:00 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
[...]
> The MTRRs are not system wide or per-package though, they are per logical CPU.
> Yes, they "need" to be consistent with respect to one another, but only when the
> CPU is actually accessing memory. This is a big reason why trying to track MTRRs
> as a per-VM asset in KVM is so difficult/messy. Software doesn't rendezvous all
> CPUs and then do the write on just one CPU, each CPU does its own writes more or
> less independently.

Ah, got it, thanks!

(Some things of each logical processor seems just a shadow of an
consolidate global one, e.g. CR0.CD. Some things are really separated
setting of each logical processor, e.g. MTRR above. Really unfathomable 😅)
>
>> BTW, with regard to KVM_X86_QUIRK_CD_NW_CLEARED, I see svm honors it while
>> vmx doesn't before it clear CR0.CD/NW.
>>
>> svm_set_cr0():
>>
>> if (kvm_check_has_quirk(vcpu->kvm, KVM_X86_QUIRK_CD_NW_CLEARED))
>> hcr0 &= ~(X86_CR0_CD | X86_CR0_NW);
>>
>>
>> vmx_set_cr0():
>>
>> hw_cr0 = (cr0 & ~KVM_VM_CR0_ALWAYS_OFF);
>>
>> Perhaps vmx side can be fixed passingly?
>
> Sadly, no. SVM and VMX manage guest memtype completely differently. VMX doesn't
> allow CR0.CD=1 when VMX is enabled, and so KVM needs to emulate CR0.CD via the EPT
> memtype.

OK, get it, thanks. Wasn't aware of this through SDM.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-05-26 03:50    [W:0.131 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site