lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRE: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling
    Date
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@nvidia.com>
    > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 8:41 PM
    > To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>; Mark Brown
    > <broonie@kernel.org>
    > Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>; jsnitsel@redhat.com;
    > robh+dt@kernel.org; peterhuewe@gmx.de; jgg@ziepe.ca;
    > krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org; linux-spi@vger.kernel.org; linux-
    > tegra@vger.kernel.org; linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org; linux-
    > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>;
    > Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>; Laxman Dewangan
    > <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
    > Subject: RE: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling
    >
    >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
    > > Sent: 24 April 2023 21:02
    > > To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
    > > Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>; Krishna Yarlagadda
    > > <kyarlagadda@nvidia.com>; jsnitsel@redhat.com; robh+dt@kernel.org;
    > > peterhuewe@gmx.de; jgg@ziepe.ca; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org;
    > > linux-spi@vger.kernel.org; linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org; linux-
    > > integrity@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Jonathan Hunter
    > > <jonathanh@nvidia.com>; Sowjanya Komatineni
    > > <skomatineni@nvidia.com>; Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
    > > Subject: Re: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling
    > >
    > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 04:18:45PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
    > > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 04:46:24PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > Would it make sense for you to pick up patch 2/3 as well? As far as I
    > > > > can tell there's a build dependency on patch 1/3 because of the newly
    > > > > added SPI_TPM_HW_FLOW symbol.
    > > >
    > > > I'll include it in my pull request for spi this time round so it should
    > > > end up in -rc1, my thinking was that I was happy with the SPI bits and
    > > > if it was in -rc1 then the TPM bits could be handled without cross tree
    > > > issues when the review was sorted (which it is now but wasn't at the
    > > > time). If the SPI side doesn't make -rc1 for some reason I can pick up
    > > > the TPM bit as well, and/or do a signed tag.
    > >
    > > Sounds good.
    > >
    > > Thanks,
    > > Thierry
    >
    > Mark,
    > Now that SPI changes are in, can we pull this TPM change for rc2.
    > Will this be picked into SPI or TPM list?
    Jarkko, Mark,
    Can we pick this change in TPM list since SPI header changes are in.

    Regards
    KY
    > Thanks,
    > KY

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2023-05-24 14:43    [W:6.589 / U:0.016 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site