lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/5] arm64/sysreg: Convert OSLAR_EL1 to automatic generation
From


On 5/23/23 13:43, Oliver Upton wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 05:22:44PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> Convert OSLAR_EL1 to automatic generation as per DDI0601 2023-03. No
>> functional change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 3 ---
>> arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 5 +++++
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> index 09de958e79ed..3b51e532caa9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> @@ -140,9 +140,6 @@
>> #define SYS_DBGWCRn_EL1(n) sys_reg(2, 0, 0, n, 7)
>> #define SYS_MDRAR_EL1 sys_reg(2, 0, 1, 0, 0)
>>
>> -#define SYS_OSLAR_EL1 sys_reg(2, 0, 1, 0, 4)
>> -#define OSLAR_EL1_OSLK BIT(0)
>> -
>> #define SYS_OSLSR_EL1 sys_reg(2, 0, 1, 1, 4)
>> #define OSLSR_EL1_OSLM_MASK (BIT(3) | BIT(0))
>> #define OSLSR_EL1_OSLM_NI 0
>
> Should the OSLSR_EL1 definitions be rolled over to the generated scheme
> as well?

Agreed, was about to ask the same question :) Any reason it got skipped ?

>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
>> index a5ae0e19fc9f..84df0b7feb45 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
>> @@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ Res0 5:1
>> Field 0 SS
>> EndSysreg
>>
>> +Sysreg OSLAR_EL1 2 0 1 0 4
>> +Res0 63:1
>> +Field 0 OSLK
>> +EndSysreg
>> +
>> Sysreg ID_PFR0_EL1 3 0 0 1 0
>> Res0 63:32
>> UnsignedEnum 31:28 RAS
>>
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-05-23 10:26    [W:0.052 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site