lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v8 7/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add multiport controller node for SC8280
From


On 5/16/2023 4:24 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:02:13PM +0530, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote:
>> On 5/15/2023 7:56 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 11:19:15AM +0530, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
>
>>>> @@ -3133,6 +3133,72 @@ usb_1_role_switch: endpoint {
>>>> };
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> + usb_2: usb@a4f8800 {
>>>
>>> As I believe someone already pointed out, this node is not in sort order
>>> (i.e. it should go before usb@a6f8800).
>
>> I missed that message, but since I named it usb_2, so I placed it in
>> order after usb_1. Hope that is fine !!
>
> No, the nodes should be sorted by unit address so you need to move it.
>

Sure, in that case will put it in between usb_0 and usb_1 nodes.

>>>> + interrupts-extended = <&pdc 127 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>>>> + <&pdc 126 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>>>> + <&pdc 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>>> + <&intc GIC_SPI 130 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>>> + <&intc GIC_SPI 135 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>>> + <&intc GIC_SPI 857 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>>> + <&intc GIC_SPI 856 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>> +
>>>> + interrupt-names = "dp_hs_phy_irq",
>>>> + "dm_hs_phy_irq",
>>>> + "ss_phy_irq",
>>>> + "pwr_event_1",
>>>> + "pwr_event_2",
>>>> + "pwr_event_3",
>>>> + "pwr_event_4";
>
>>>> + interconnect-names = "usb-ddr", "apps-usb";
>>>
>>> Looks like 'wakeup-source' is missing here too.
>>>
>>
>> I believe this property was added to enable wakeup from system suspend
>> in host mode. I didn't add this property as currently I don't need to
>> support wakeup. If any requirement comes in future, then I might need to
>> add dp/dm interrupts (if any) for other ports as well and then need to
>> change driver code to enable/disable them on suspend/resume.
>
> If there are dp/dm/ss interrupts per ports then those need to be defined
> in the binding and devicetree from the start.
>
> Similar for 'wakeup-source' which indicates that the controller *can* be
> used to wakeup the system from suspend (which those pdc interrupts
> indicates).
>
> Remember that the devicetree is supposed to describe the hardware, and
> which features are currently supported in some version of software is
> mostly irrelevant.
>
> Johan

Can I take this up as a separate series (Wakeup support for multiport)
once this series is merged. If I am adding interrupts for other ports, I
can add driver code to handle those interrupts as well.

Regards,
Krishna,

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-05-16 16:26    [W:0.218 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site