Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 2 Apr 2023 10:13:32 -0700 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] tools/nolibc: assorted build fixes for nolibc-test in rare cases |
| |
On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 10:13:55AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hello Paul, > > please find in this series two small build fixes. One of them concerns > two missing include files for building the test against other libc (at > least glibc) since we added the tests for integer types and ranges. The > second one removes a single occurrence of a variable definition inside > the init statement of a for loop that breaks with older compilers which > do not default to c99. They're still convenient to test the portability > of the lib itself and I continue to use them for this purpose. > > I consider that there's no rush on this, since these issues only affect > developers adding test cases, who should normally rebase on top of your > dev branch. So it's fine if it goes there.
Queued and pushed for the v6.5 merge window (the one after the upcoming one), thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> Thank you! > Willy > > Willy Tarreau (2): > tools/nolibc: tests: fix build on non-c99 compliant compilers > tools/nolibc: fix build of the test case using glibc > > tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > -- > 2.17.5 >
| |