lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/6] dt-bindings: watchdog: realtek,otto-wdt: simplify requiring interrupt-names
From
Date
Hi Krzysztof,

On Sat, 2023-04-15 at 11:51 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Required properties should be listed in "required:" block.  Since
> interrupts are already there, the dependency of interrupt-names on the
> interrupts can be simplified.

Maybe I'm not reading this right, but isn't the dependency stated in the binding
"interrupts requires interrupt-names to be present"? resource-names.txt
describes the reverse dependency ("interrupt-names is only meaningful with an
associated interrupts").

>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---

In any case, I'm OK with a flattened requirements list:

Acked-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>


Best,
Sander


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-04-16 21:11    [W:0.130 / U:0.584 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site