lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/7] erofs: handle long xattr name prefixes properly
From


On 2023/4/7 22:17, Jingbo Xu wrote:
> Make .{list,get}xattr routines adapted to long xattr name prefixes.
> When the bit 7 of erofs_xattr_entry.e_name_index is set, it indicates
> that it refers to a long xattr name prefix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> fs/erofs/xattr.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/xattr.c b/fs/erofs/xattr.c
> index 684571e83a2c..8d81593655e8 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/xattr.c
> @@ -301,11 +301,39 @@ struct getxattr_iter {
> struct qstr name;
> };
>
> +static int erofs_xattr_long_entrymatch(struct getxattr_iter *it,
> + struct erofs_xattr_entry *entry)
> +{
> + struct erofs_sb_info *sbi = EROFS_SB(it->it.sb);
> + u8 idx = entry->e_name_index & EROFS_XATTR_LONG_PREFIX_MASK;
> + struct erofs_xattr_prefix_item *pf;
> +
> + if (idx >= sbi->xattr_prefix_count)
> + return -ENOATTR;
> +
> + pf = &sbi->xattr_prefixes[idx];

struct erofs_xattr_prefix_item *pf = sbi->xattr_prefixes + idx;

if (pf >= sbi->xattr_prefixes + sbi->xattr_prefix_count)
return -ENOATTR;

?


> + if (it->index != pf->prefix->base_index)
> + return -ENOATTR;
> +
> + if (strncmp(it->name.name, pf->prefix->infix, pf->infix_len))
> + return -ENOATTR;
> +
> + it->name.name += pf->infix_len;
> + it->name.len -= pf->infix_len;
> + if (it->name.len != entry->e_name_len)
> + return -ENOATTR;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int xattr_entrymatch(struct xattr_iter *_it,
> struct erofs_xattr_entry *entry)
> {
> struct getxattr_iter *it = container_of(_it, struct getxattr_iter, it);
>
> + /* should also match the infix for long name prefixes */
> + if (entry->e_name_index & EROFS_XATTR_LONG_PREFIX)
> + return erofs_xattr_long_entrymatch(it, entry);
> +
> return (it->index != entry->e_name_index ||
> it->name.len != entry->e_name_len) ? -ENOATTR : 0;
> }
> @@ -487,12 +515,26 @@ static int xattr_entrylist(struct xattr_iter *_it,
> {
> struct listxattr_iter *it =
> container_of(_it, struct listxattr_iter, it);
> - unsigned int prefix_len;
> - const char *prefix;
> -
> - const struct xattr_handler *h =
> - erofs_xattr_handler(entry->e_name_index);
> + unsigned int base_index = entry->e_name_index;
> + unsigned int prefix_len, infix_len = 0;
> + const char *prefix, *infix = NULL;
> + const struct xattr_handler *h;
> +
> + if (entry->e_name_index & EROFS_XATTR_LONG_PREFIX) {
> + struct erofs_sb_info *sbi = EROFS_SB(_it->sb);
> + u8 idx = entry->e_name_index & EROFS_XATTR_LONG_PREFIX_MASK;
> + struct erofs_xattr_prefix_item *pf;
> +
> + if (idx >= sbi->xattr_prefix_count)
> + return 1;
> +
> + pf = &sbi->xattr_prefixes[idx];

struct erofs_xattr_prefix_item *pf = sbi->xattr_prefixes + idx;

if (pf >= sbi->xattr_prefixes + sbi->xattr_prefix_count)
return 1;
?


Otherwise it looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>

Thanks,
Gao Xiang


> + infix = pf->prefix->infix;
> + infix_len = pf->infix_len;
> + base_index = pf->prefix->base_index;
> + }
>
> + h = erofs_xattr_handler(base_index);
> if (!h || (h->list && !h->list(it->dentry)))
> return 1;
>
> @@ -500,16 +542,18 @@ static int xattr_entrylist(struct xattr_iter *_it,
> prefix_len = strlen(prefix);
>
> if (!it->buffer) {
> - it->buffer_ofs += prefix_len + entry->e_name_len + 1;
> + it->buffer_ofs += prefix_len + infix_len +
> + entry->e_name_len + 1;
> return 1;
> }
>
> - if (it->buffer_ofs + prefix_len
> + if (it->buffer_ofs + prefix_len + infix_len +
> + entry->e_name_len + 1 > it->buffer_size)
> return -ERANGE;
>
> memcpy(it->buffer + it->buffer_ofs, prefix, prefix_len);
> - it->buffer_ofs += prefix_len;
> + memcpy(it->buffer + it->buffer_ofs + prefix_len, infix, infix_len);
> + it->buffer_ofs += prefix_len + infix_len;
> return 0;
> }
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-04-10 07:54    [W:0.044 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site