lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH RESEND net-next v4 0/4] net/mlx5e: Add GBP VxLAN HW offload support
From

On 3/9/2023 4:13 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 02:34:28PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> From: Gavin Li <gavinl@nvidia.com>
>> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 10:22:36 +0800
>>
>>> On 3/8/2023 12:58 AM, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Gavin Li <gavinl@nvidia.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 17:19:35 +0800
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/6/2023 10:47 PM, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>>>>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Gavin Li <gavinl@nvidia.com>
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 05:02:58 +0200
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patch-1: Remove unused argument from functions.
>>>>>>> Patch-2: Expose helper function vxlan_build_gbp_hdr.
>>>>>>> Patch-3: Add helper function for encap_info_equal for tunnels with
>>>>>>> options.
>>>>>>> Patch-4: Add HW offloading support for TC flows with VxLAN GBP
>>>>>>> encap/decap
>>>>>>> in mlx ethernet driver.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gavin Li (4):
>>>>>>> vxlan: Remove unused argument from vxlan_build_gbp_hdr( ) and
>>>>>>> vxlan_build_gpe_hdr( )
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> changelog:
>>>>>>> v2->v3
>>>>>>> - Addressed comments from Paolo Abeni
>>>>>>> - Add new patch
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> vxlan: Expose helper vxlan_build_gbp_hdr
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> changelog:
>>>>>>> v1->v2
>>>>>>> - Addressed comments from Alexander Lobakin
>>>>>>> - Use const to annotate read-only the pointer parameter
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> net/mlx5e: Add helper for encap_info_equal for tunnels with
>>>>>>> options
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> changelog:
>>>>>>> v3->v4
>>>>>>> - Addressed comments from Alexander Lobakin
>>>>>>> - Fix vertical alignment issue
>>>>>>> v1->v2
>>>>>>> - Addressed comments from Alexander Lobakin
>>>>>>> - Replace confusing pointer arithmetic with function call
>>>>>>> - Use boolean operator NOT to check if the function return value is
>>>>>>> not zero
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> net/mlx5e: TC, Add support for VxLAN GBP encap/decap flows offload
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> changelog:
>>>>>>> v3->v4
>>>>>>> - Addressed comments from Simon Horman
>>>>>>> - Using cast in place instead of changing API
>>>>>> I don't remember me acking this. The last thing I said is that in order
>>>>>> to avoid cast-aways you need to use _Generic(). 2 times. IIRC you said
>>>>>> "Ack" and that was the last message in that thread.
>>>>>> Now this. Without me in CCs, so I noticed it accidentally.
>>>>>> ???
>>>>> Not asked by you but you said you were OK if I used cast-aways. So I did
>>>>> the
>>>>>
>>>>> change in V3 and reverted back to using cast-away in V4.
>>>> My last reply was[0]:
>>>>
>>>> "
>>>> You wouldn't need to W/A it each time in each driver, just do it once in
>>>> the inline itself.
>>>> I did it once in __skb_header_pointer()[0] to be able to pass data
>>>> pointer as const to optimize code a bit and point out explicitly that
>>>> the function doesn't modify the packet anyhow, don't see any reason to
>>>> not do the same here.
>>>> Or, as I said, you can use macros + __builtin_choose_expr() or _Generic.
>>>> container_of_const() uses the latter[1]. A __builtin_choose_expr()
>>>> variant could rely on the __same_type() macro to check whether the
>>>> pointer passed from the driver const or not.
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> [0]
>>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.2-rc8/source/include/linux/skbuff.h#L3992
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.2-rc8/source/include/linux/container_of.h#L33
>>>> "
>>>>
>>>> Where did I say here I'm fine with W/As in the drivers? I mentioned two
>>>> options: cast-away in THE GENERIC INLINE, not the driver, or, more
>>>> preferred, following the way of container_of_const().
>>>> Then your reply[1]:
>>>>
>>>> "ACK"
>>>>
>>>> What did you ack then if you picked neither of those 2 options?
>>> I had fixed it with "cast-away in THE GENERIC INLINE" in V3 and got
>>> comments and concern
>>>
>>> from Simon Horman. So, it was reverted.
>>>
>>> "But I really do wonder if this patch masks rather than fixes the
>>> problem."----From Simon.
>>>
>>> I thought you were OK to revert the changes based on the reply.
>> No I wasn't.
>> Yes, it masks, because you need to return either const or non-const
>> depending on the input pointer qualifier. container_of_const(), telling
>> this 4th time.
>>
>>> From my understanding, the function always return a non-const pointer
>>> regardless the type of the
>>>
>>> input one, which is slightly different from your examples.
>> See above.
>>
>>> Any comments, Simon?
>>>
>>> If both or you are OK with option #1, I'll follow.
> I'd like suggest moving on from the who said what aspect of this conversation.
> Clearly there has been some misunderstanding. Let's move on.
>
> Regarding the more technical topic of constness.
> Unless I am mistaken function in question looks like this:
>
> static inline void *ip_tunnel_info_opts(const struct ip_tunnel_info *info)
> {
> return info + 1;
> }
>
> My view is that if the input is const, the output should be const;
> conversely, if the output is non-const then the input should be non-const.
>
> It does seem to me that container_of_const has this property.
> And from that perspective may be the basis of a good solution.
>
> This is my opinion. I do understand that others may have different opinions.
ACK

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 00:51    [W:0.233 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site