lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 5/5] mfd: max77541: Add ADI MAX77541/MAX77540 PMIC Support
From
Date
On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 18:47 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 04:51:18PM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 17:35 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 04:18:30PM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 14:46 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 03:26:44PM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > IIRC, regmap_read() is not really reentrant and it is used
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > IIO
> > > > > > driver on the sysfs interface. So, yeah, I think you need
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > regmap
> > > > > > lock and better just leave the config as is. Yes, the lock
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > opt-
> > > > > > out
> > > > > > so let's not disable it :)
> > > > >
> > > > > All the regmap operations are fully thread safe.
> > > >
> > > > Even if 'config->disable_locking' is set? I think that is
> > > > what's
> > > > being
> > > > discussed in here...
> > >
> > > In case the driver has its own lock to serialize IO how on earth
> > > the
> > > regmap
> > > lock is needed. That's what I asked the author of the driver. He
> > > told
> > > the code
> >
> > Well, if the driver has it's own locking, then sure we do not need
> > regmap's lock...
> >
> > > doesn't require the regmap lock, and I tend to believe the
> > > author.
> > > So, why to
> > > keep it?
> >
> > However, if you look at the adc driver, I can see plain
> > regmap_read()
> > calls without any "outside" locking.
>
> Then author of the code should know what they are doing. Right?
>

In theory yes, but you know that's not always the case :)

- Nuno Sá

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-29 08:59    [W:0.153 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site