Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Mar 2023 16:21:54 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 08/11] remoteproc: qcom: Add Hexagon based multipd rproc driver | From | Manikanta Mylavarapu <> |
| |
On 3/22/2023 3:51 PM, Robert Marko wrote: > On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 11:19, Manikanta Mylavarapu > <quic_mmanikan@quicinc.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 3/7/2023 9:09 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> Why exactly do you need a new driver for this instead of extending >>> existing PIL? I feel all this is growing because no one wants to touch >>> existing code and merge with it... >> >> Previously we raised patch to add secure-pil to existing rproc driver. >> Bjorn suggested to introduce a new secure-pil driver. >> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/1611984013-10201-3-git-send-email-gokulsri@codeaurora.org/ >> >> >> Also IPQ5018, IPQ9574 soc's follows multipd model. So we decided to >> have new driver which consists 'secure-pil + multi pd' in one >> place. > > Would it be possible to have IPQ8074 and IPQ6018 support in it as well? > Cause, those are supported by ath11k but remoteproc support is missing, > I have been upstreaming parts for IPQ8074 for years now and it is usable but > we are still missing remoteproc. > > Regards, > Robert > >> >> Thanks & Regards, >> Manikanta.
Yes. It's possible. Currently we added support for IPQ5018, IPQ9574. In subsequent patches, we will add IPQ8074, IPQ6018 & IPQ5332 support as well.
Regards, Manikanta.
| |