Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:40:10 +0530 | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v18 3/7] crash: add generic infrastructure for crash hotplug support | | From | Sourabh Jain <> |
| |
Hello Eric,
On 01/02/23 04:12, Eric DeVolder wrote: > To support crash hotplug, a mechanism is needed to update the crash > elfcorehdr upon CPU or memory changes (eg. hot un/plug or off/ > onlining). > > To track CPU changes, callbacks are registered with the cpuhp > mechanism via cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_BP_PREPARE_DYN). The > crash hotplug elfcorehdr update has no explicit ordering requirement > (relative to other cpuhp states), so meets the criteria for > utilizing CPUHP_BP_PREPARE_DYN. CPUHP_BP_PREPARE_DYN is a dynamic > state and avoids the need to introduce a new state for crash > hotplug. Also, this is the last state in the PREPARE group, just > prior to the STARTING group, which is very close to the CPU > starting up in an plug/online situation, or stopping in a unplug/ > offline situation. This minimizes the window of time during an > actual plug/online or unplug/offline situation in which the > elfcorehdr would be inaccurate. > > Note, that when a CPU is being unplugged/offlined, the CPU is still > in the foreach_present_cpu() during the regeneration of the > elfcorehdr. Thus there is a need to explicitly check and exclude > the soon-to-be offlined CPU. See patch 'kexec: exclude hot remove > cpu from elfcorehdr notes'. > > To track memory changes, a notifier is registered to capture the > memblock MEM_ONLINE and MEM_OFFLINE events via register_memory_notifier(). > > The cpu callbacks and memory notifiers invoke handle_hotplug_event() > which performs needed tasks and then dispatches the event to the > architecture specific arch_crash_handle_hotplug_event() to update the > elfcorehdr with the current state of CPUs and memory. During the > process, the kexec_lock is held. > > Signed-off-by: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@oracle.com> > Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> > --- > include/linux/crash_core.h | 9 +++ > include/linux/kexec.h | 12 ++++ > kernel/crash_core.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 160 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/crash_core.h b/include/linux/crash_core.h > index de62a722431e..ed868d237c07 100644 > --- a/include/linux/crash_core.h > +++ b/include/linux/crash_core.h > @@ -84,4 +84,13 @@ int parse_crashkernel_high(char *cmdline, unsigned long long system_ram, > int parse_crashkernel_low(char *cmdline, unsigned long long system_ram, > unsigned long long *crash_size, unsigned long long *crash_base); > > +#define KEXEC_CRASH_HP_NONE 0 > +#define KEXEC_CRASH_HP_REMOVE_CPU 1 > +#define KEXEC_CRASH_HP_ADD_CPU 2 > +#define KEXEC_CRASH_HP_REMOVE_MEMORY 3 > +#define KEXEC_CRASH_HP_ADD_MEMORY 4 > +#define KEXEC_CRASH_HP_INVALID_CPU -1U > + > +struct kimage; > + > #endif /* LINUX_CRASH_CORE_H */ > diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h > index 27ef420c7a45..a52624ae4452 100644 > --- a/include/linux/kexec.h > +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ extern note_buf_t __percpu *crash_notes; > #include <linux/compat.h> > #include <linux/ioport.h> > #include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/highmem.h> > #include <asm/kexec.h> > > /* Verify architecture specific macros are defined */ > @@ -371,6 +372,13 @@ struct kimage { > struct purgatory_info purgatory_info; > #endif > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_HOTPLUG > + int hp_action; > + unsigned int offlinecpu; > + bool elfcorehdr_index_valid; > + int elfcorehdr_index;
May be I am reiterating myself but I think we can manage without elfcorehdr_index_valid.
Here is how: Initialize the elfcorehdr_index with a negative value in do_kimage_alloc_init function (it is called for both kexec_load and kexec_file_load).
Now when the control reaches to handle_hotplug_event function and if elfcorehdr_index has negative value find the correct index and re-initialize the elfcorehdr_index.
Thoughts?
Thanks, Sourabh Jain
|  |