lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 35/45] clk: mediatek: Split MT8195 clock drivers and allow module build
From
Il 08/02/23 09:28, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 11:30 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> MT8195 clock drivers were encapsulated in one single (and big) Kconfig
>> option: there's no reason to do that, as it is totally unnecessary to
>> build in all or none of them.
>>
>> Split them out: keep boot-critical clocks as bool and allow choosing
>> non critical clocks as tristate.
>
> The power domain controller references vppsys*, vdecsys*, vdosys*, wpesys,
> imgsys and camsys. I'd argue that this makes these clock drivers
> semi-boot-critical. Maybe mfgcfg as well when we add the GPU?

You don't need to power on additional power domains if you want to load modules
from a ramdisk! :-)

Besides, you caught me: mtk-pm-domains will be my next target after clocks...
I don't like how it behaves in regard to probe deferrals. Specifically,
I dislike the fact that you either register *all domains* or *none at all*
(unless instantiating two different driver instances and that's ugly).


Angelo

>
> They should be bundled together at the very least. The power domain
> controller not probing disables all display and multimedia capabilities.
>
> Also wondering if we should have "default COMMON_CLK_MT8195" ...
>
> I suppose the same questions apply to other SoCs.
>
> ChenYu


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 00:14    [W:0.129 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site