lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/4] locktorture: Add nested locking to mutex torture tests
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 9:20 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 11:07:53AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > On Fri, 03 Feb 2023, John Stultz wrote:
> >
> > > This patch adds randomized nested locking to the mutex torture
> > > tests, as well as new LOCK08 config files for testing mutexes
> > > with nested locking
> > >
> > > This was inspired by locktorture extensions originally implemented
> > > by Connor O'Brien, for stress testing the proxy-execution series:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221003214501.2050087-12-connoro@google.com/
> > >
> > > Comments or feedback would be greatly appreciated!
> > >
> > > Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
> > > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> > > Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> > > Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
> >
> > Just realized I sent two review tags for rtmutex, one was supposed
> > to be this patch.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
>
> Thank you!
>
> I will apply this to these commits on my next rebase:
>
> f5a632cbbbea ("locktorture: Add nested locking to mutex torture tests")
> 83743c9839f5 ("locktorture: Add nested locking to rtmutex torture tests")
>
> John, if you send a new version of these, please add Davidlohr's review
> tags.

Yeah. I'll respin to address most of the feedback.

thanks
-john

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 00:11    [W:0.054 / U:0.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site