lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] check-uapi: Introduce check-uapi.sh
From
On 2/18/2023 12:17 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 12:22:34PM -0800, John Moon wrote:
>> While the kernel community has been good at maintaining backwards
>> compatibility with kernel UAPIs, it would be helpful to have a tool
>> to check if a patch introduces changes that break backwards
>> compatibility.
>>
>> To that end, introduce check-uapi.sh: a simple shell script that
>> checks for changes to UAPI headers using libabigail.
>>
>> libabigail is "a framework which aims at helping developers and
>> software distributors to spot some ABI-related issues like interface
>> incompatibility in ELF shared libraries by performing a static
>> analysis of the ELF binaries at hand."
>>
>> The script uses one of libabigail's tools, "abidiff", to compile the
>> changed header before and after the patch to detect any changes.
>>
>> abidiff "compares the ABI of two shared libraries in ELF format. It
>> emits a meaningful report describing the differences between the two
>> ABIs."
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Moon <quic_johmoo@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> scripts/check-uapi.sh | 245 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 245 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100755 scripts/check-uapi.sh
>
> Ok, this is very cool, thank you so much for doing this.
>
> I know Randy Dunlap was also looking into this previously, so I've cc:ed
> him and bounced him the original.
>

Okay, will keep him in the loop!

> I tried this out, and at first glance, this felt like it was just "too
> fast" in that nothing actually was being tested. So I manually added a
> field to a structure I know would break the abi, and:
>
> $ ./scripts/check-uapi.sh
> !!! ABI differences detected in include/uapi/linux/usb/ch9.h (compared to file at HEAD^1) !!!
>
> [C] 'struct usb_ctrlrequest' changed:
> type size changed from 64 to 72 (in bits)
> 1 data member insertion:
> '__u8 abi_break', at offset 16 (in bits) at ch9.h:216:1
> 3 data member changes:
> '__le16 wValue' offset changed from 16 to 24 (in bits) (by +8 bits)
> '__le16 wIndex' offset changed from 32 to 40 (in bits) (by +8 bits)
> '__le16 wLength' offset changed from 48 to 56 (in bits) (by +8 bits)
>
> 0/1 UAPI header file changes are backwards compatible
> UAPI header ABI check failed
>
> So it worked!
>
> There is a mismatch of different bash coding styles in the document, which
> isn't a big deal, and one warning produced by the `shellcheck` tool, but that
> can all be fixed up later. I'll go queue this up now, as a starting point for
> people to play with, thanks!
>

Will resolve all shellcheck warnings in next rev. Not sure about the
coding style differences you're referring to - is there a shell script
coding style document?

> Also, it would be nice to be able to check if the current tree with changes in
> it (not checked in, just modified) breaks the abi, without having to go and
> check the change in. But again, future fixups for people to do!
>

Should be straightforward to add. Since I'm making another rev, I'll
take care of this as well.

> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 00:32    [W:0.156 / U:0.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site