lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 RFC Zisslpcfi 11/20] mmu: maybe_mkwrite updated to manufacture shadow stack PTEs
From
On 13.02.23 05:53, Deepak Gupta wrote:
> maybe_mkwrite creates PTEs with WRITE encodings for underlying arch if
> VM_WRITE is turned on in vma->vm_flags. Shadow stack memory is a write-
> able memory except it can only be written by certain specific
> instructions. This patch allows maybe_mkwrite to create shadow stack PTEs
> if vma is shadow stack VMA. Each arch can define which combination of VMA
> flags means a shadow stack.
>
> Additionally pte_mkshdwstk must be provided by arch specific PTE
> construction headers to create shadow stack PTEs. (in arch specific
> pgtable.h).
>
> This patch provides dummy/stub pte_mkshdwstk if CONFIG_USER_SHADOW_STACK
> is not selected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/pgtable.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 8f857163ac89..a7705bc49bfe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1093,6 +1093,21 @@ static inline unsigned long thp_size(struct page *page)
> void free_compound_page(struct page *page);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USER_SHADOW_STACK
> +bool arch_is_shadow_stack_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
> +#endif
> +
> +static inline bool
> +is_shadow_stack_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USER_SHADOW_STACK
> + return arch_is_shadow_stack_vma(vma);
> +#else
> + return false;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Do pte_mkwrite, but only if the vma says VM_WRITE. We do this when
> * servicing faults for write access. In the normal case, do always want
> @@ -1101,8 +1116,12 @@ void free_compound_page(struct page *page);
> */
> static inline pte_t maybe_mkwrite(pte_t pte, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> - if (likely(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
> - pte = pte_mkwrite(pte);
> + if (likely(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE)) {
> + if (unlikely(is_shadow_stack_vma(vma)))
> + pte = pte_mkshdwstk(pte);
> + else
> + pte = pte_mkwrite(pte);
> + }
> return pte;

Exactly what we are trying to avoid in the x86 approach right now.
Please see the x86 series on details, we shouldn't try reinventing the
wheel but finding a core-mm approach that fits multiple architectures.

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230119212317.8324-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 00:19    [W:0.178 / U:1.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site