Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:30:14 -0800 | From | Dan Williams <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cxl/cdat: Fix header sum value in CDAT checksum |
| |
Ira Weiny wrote: > Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 17:33:04 -0800 > > Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231116-fix-cdat-devm-free-v1-1-b148b40707d7@intel.com/ > > > > > > Fixes: aba578bdace5 ("hw/cxl/cdat: CXL CDAT Data Object Exchange implementation") > > > Cc: Huai-Cheng Kuo <hchkuo@avery-design.com.tw> > > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> > > > > This only becomes a problem with the addition of DCDs so I'm not going to rush it in. > > That makes sense. > > > Btw cc qemu-devel on qemu patches! > > > > Ah... yea my bad.
Might I also ask for a more prominent way to quickly identify kernel vs qemu patches, like a "[QEMU PATCH]" prefix? I tend to look for "hw/" in the diff path names, but the kernel vs qemu question is ambiguous when looking at the linux-cxl Patchwork queue.
@Jonathan, what do you think of having the kernel patchwork-bot watch your tree for updating patch state (if it is not happening already).
| |