lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next 01/24] locking/local_lock: Introduce guard definition for local_lock.
From
Date
On Fri, 2023-12-15 at 18:07 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Introduce lock guard definition for local_lock_t. There are no users
> yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> include/linux/local_lock.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock.h b/include/linux/local_lock.h
> index e55010fa73296..706c4b65d9449 100644
> --- a/include/linux/local_lock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/local_lock.h
> @@ -51,4 +51,15 @@
> #define local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags) \
> __local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)
>
> +DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock, local_lock_t,
> + local_lock(_T->lock),
> + local_unlock(_T->lock))
> +DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irq, local_lock_t,
> + local_lock_irq(_T->lock),
> + local_unlock_irq(_T->lock))

DEFINE_GUARD should fit for the 2 above, right?

Cheers,

Paolo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-12-18 09:17    [W:0.292 / U:0.448 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site