lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 2/8] dt-bindings: tpm: Add schema for TIS I2C devices
    Hey,

    On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 10:39:58AM -0600, Ninad Palsule wrote:
    > From: Johannes Holland <johannes.holland@infineon.com>
    >
    > Add a dt schema to support device tree bindings

    "Add bindings for..."

    > for the generic I2C
    > physical layer. Refer to the TCG PC Client Platform TPM Profile (PTP)
    > Specification for TPM 2.0 v1.04 Revision 14.
    >
    > This includes descriptions for the Nuvoton and Infineon devices.
    >

    > OpenBMC-Staging-Count: 3

    I have no idea what this is, but it needs to be removed from the patch.

    > Signed-off-by: Johannes Holland <johannes.holland@infineon.com>
    > Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
    > Signed-off-by: Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com>
    > ---
    > .../bindings/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml | 50 +++++++++++++++++++
    > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
    > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml
    >
    > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml
    > new file mode 100644
    > index 000000000000..de1e34065748
    > --- /dev/null
    > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml
    > @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
    > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
    > +%YAML 1.2
    > +---
    > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml#
    > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
    > +
    > +title: I2C PTP based TPM Devices
    > +
    > +maintainers:
    > + - Johannes Holland <johannes.holland@infineon.com>
    > +
    > +description:
    > + Device Tree Bindings for I2C based Trusted Platform Module (TPM).

    s/Device Tree Bindings for //. Doesn't dt_binding_check now complain if
    you have this in a title or description?

    > +properties:
    > + $nodename:
    > + pattern: "^tpm(@[0-9a-f]+)?$"
    > +
    > + compatible:
    > + oneOf:
    > + - description: Infineon's Trusted Platform Module (TPM) (SLB9673).
    > + items:
    > + - const: infineon,slb9673
    > + - const: tcg,tpm-tis-i2c
    > + - description: Nuvoton's Trusted Platform Module (TPM) (NPCT75x).
    > + items:
    > + - const: nuvoton,npct75x
    > + - const: tcg,tpm-tis-i2c

    > + - const: tcg,tpm-tis-i2c

    IMO this should be removed and this fallback should only be used in
    combination with device specific compatibles, like you have here for the
    infineon and nuvoton devices.

    Cheers,
    Conor.

    > + reg:
    > + maxItems: 1
    > +
    > +required:
    > + - compatible
    > + - reg
    > +
    > +additionalProperties: false
    > +
    > +examples:
    > + - |
    > + i2c {
    > + #address-cells = <1>;
    > + #size-cells = <0>;
    > +
    > + tpm@2e {
    > + compatible = "nuvoton,npct75x", "tcg,tpm-tis-i2c";
    > + reg = <0x2e>;
    > + };
    > + };
    > +...
    > --
    > 2.39.2
    >
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2023-12-12 18:15    [W:2.306 / U:0.060 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site