lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 1/3] thermal: core: Make thermal_zone_device_unregister() return after freeing the zone
From
On 11/12/2023 17:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 5:28 PM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 08/12/2023 20:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Make thermal_zone_device_unregister() wait until all of the references
>>> to the given thermal zone object have been dropped and free it before
>>> returning.
>>>
>>> This guarantees that when thermal_zone_device_unregister() returns,
>>> there is no leftover activity regarding the thermal zone in question
>>> which is required by some of its callers (for instance, modular driver
>>> code that wants to know when it is safe to let the module go away).
>>>
>>> Subsequently, this will allow some confusing device_is_registered()
>>> checks to be dropped from the thermal sysfs and core code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Definitively agree on the change
>>
>> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>
> Thanks!
>
>> Would it make sense to use kref_get/put ?
>
> Why and where?

Well it is a general question. Usually this kind of removal is tied with
a refcount

--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-12-11 18:35    [W:0.046 / U:2.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site