Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Mon, 6 Nov 2023 14:36:59 -0800 | From | Jakub Kicinski <> | Subject | Re: Missing a write memory barrier in tls_init() |
| |
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 16:11:29 +0900 Dae R. Jeong wrote: > In addition, I believe the {tls_setsockopt, tls_getsockopt} > implementation is fine because of the address dependency. I think > load-load reordering is prohibited in this case so we don't need a > read barrier.
Sounds plausible, could you send a patch?
The smb_wmb() would be better placed in tls_init(), IMHO.
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |