Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Nov 2023 17:18:29 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] mm/compaction: enable compacting >0 order folios. | From | Baolin Wang <> |
| |
On 11/14/2023 1:01 AM, Zi Yan wrote: > From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> > > migrate_pages() supports >0 order folio migration and during compaction, > even if compaction_alloc() cannot provide >0 order free pages, > migrate_pages() can split the source page and try to migrate the base pages > from the split. It can be a baseline and start point for adding support for > compacting >0 order folios. > > Suggested-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> > --- > mm/compaction.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c > index 01ba298739dd..5217dd35b493 100644 > --- a/mm/compaction.c > +++ b/mm/compaction.c > @@ -816,6 +816,21 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(struct compact_control *cc) > return too_many; > } > > +/* > + * 1. if the page order is larger than or equal to target_order (i.e., > + * cc->order and when it is not -1 for global compaction), skip it since > + * target_order already indicates no free page with larger than target_order > + * exists and later migrating it will most likely fail; > + * > + * 2. compacting > pageblock_order pages does not improve memory fragmentation, > + * skip them; > + */ > +static bool skip_isolation_on_order(int order, int target_order) > +{ > + return (target_order != -1 && order >= target_order) || > + order >= pageblock_order; > +} > + > /** > * isolate_migratepages_block() - isolate all migrate-able pages within > * a single pageblock > @@ -1009,7 +1024,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn, > /* > * Regardless of being on LRU, compound pages such as THP and > * hugetlbfs are not to be compacted unless we are attempting > - * an allocation much larger than the huge page size (eg CMA). > + * an allocation larger than the compound page size. > * We can potentially save a lot of iterations if we skip them > * at once. The check is racy, but we can consider only valid > * values and the only danger is skipping too much. > @@ -1017,11 +1032,18 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn, > if (PageCompound(page) && !cc->alloc_contig) { > const unsigned int order = compound_order(page); > > - if (likely(order <= MAX_ORDER)) { > - low_pfn += (1UL << order) - 1; > - nr_scanned += (1UL << order) - 1; > + /* > + * Skip based on page order and compaction target order > + * and skip hugetlbfs pages. > + */ > + if (skip_isolation_on_order(order, cc->order) || > + PageHuge(page)) { > + if (order <= MAX_ORDER) { > + low_pfn += (1UL << order) - 1; > + nr_scanned += (1UL << order) - 1; > + } > + goto isolate_fail; > } > - goto isolate_fail; > } > > /* > @@ -1144,17 +1166,18 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn, > goto isolate_abort; > } > } > + } > > - /* > - * folio become large since the non-locked check, > - * and it's on LRU. > - */ > - if (unlikely(folio_test_large(folio) && !cc->alloc_contig)) { > - low_pfn += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1; > - nr_scanned += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1; > - folio_set_lru(folio); > - goto isolate_fail_put; > - } > + /* > + * Check LRU folio order under the lock > + */ > + if (unlikely(skip_isolation_on_order(folio_order(folio), > + cc->order) && > + !cc->alloc_contig)) { > + low_pfn += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1; > + nr_scanned += folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1; > + folio_set_lru(folio); > + goto isolate_fail_put; > }
Why was this part moved out of the 'if (lruvec != locked)' block? If we hold the lru lock, then we do not need to check again, right?
| |