lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] platform/chromeos: cros_ec: Use per-device lockdep key
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 5:08 PM Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 12:55:37PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > Lockdep reports a bogus possible deadlock on MT8192 Chromebooks due to
> > the following lock sequences:
> >
> > 1. lock(i2c_register_adapter) [1]; lock(&ec_dev->lock)
> > 2. lock(&ec_dev->lock); lock(prepare_lock);
> >
> > The actual dependency chains are much longer. The shortened version
> > looks somewhat like:
> >
> > 1. cros-ec-rpmsg on mtk-scp
> > ec_dev->lock -> prepare_lock
> > 2. In rt5682_i2c_probe() on native I2C bus:
> > prepare_lock -> regmap->lock -> (possibly) i2c_adapter->bus_lock
> > 3. In rt5682_i2c_probe() on native I2C bus:
> > regmap->lock -> i2c_adapter->bus_lock
> > 4. In sbs_probe() on cros-ec-i2c (passthrough) I2C bus on cros-ec
> > i2c_adapter->bus_lock -> ec_dev->lock
> >
> > While lockdep is correct that the shared lockdep classes have a circular
> > dependency, it is bogus because
> >
> > a) 2+3 happen on a native I2C bus
> > b) 4 happens on the actual EC on ChromeOS devices
> > c) 1 happens on the SCP coprocessor on MediaTek Chromebooks that just
> > happen to expose a cros-ec interface, but do not have a passthrough
> > I2C bus
> >
> > In short, the "dependencies" are actually on different devices.
>
> Path of 4 looks weird to me.
>
> Could you point out where sbs_probe() gets to acquire ec_dev->lock?

sbs_probe() calls sbs_get_battery_presence_and_health(), which

-> does an I2C transfer. This SBS instance is connected on the I2C bus
on the EC, so the I2C transfer

-> acquires i2c_adapter->bus_lock, and

-> calls ec_i2c_xfer(), which

-> calls cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(), which

-> calls cros_ec_cmd_xfer(), which

-> acquires ec_dev->lock


> I may misunderstand: I thought there is no such I2C bus for passthrough
> from kernel's point of view (as the bus and devices behind the EC).
> See also [2].

It is an I2C adapter on the EC, also known as i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.
Passthrough probably isn't the right word.

> [2]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.2-rc2/source/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c#L241
>
>
> On a related note, for the commit title: s/chromeos/chrome/ if it gets
> chance to have next version.

OK.


Thanks
ChenYu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:31    [W:0.372 / U:1.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site