Messages in this thread | | | From | Ping-Ke Shih <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH 2/4] rtw88: Configure the registers from rtw_bf_assoc() outside the RCU lock | Date | Thu, 5 Jan 2023 00:44:47 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2023 11:44 PM > To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> > Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; kvalo@kernel.org; s.hauer@pengutronix.de; tony0620emma@gmail.com; > netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] rtw88: Configure the registers from rtw_bf_assoc() outside the RCU lock > > Hi Ping-Ke, > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:48 AM Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote: > [...] > > > Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> > > > > I think my reviewed-by should behind your signed-off-by. > My understanding is that I have to put your Reviewed-by above my > Signed-off-by since I added the Reviewed-by to the description. > If the maintainer adds your Reviewed-by while applying the patch to > the tree they will put your Reviewed-by between my Signed-off-by and > the maintainer's Signed-off-by. > > If this is incorrect then please let me know and I'll change it for v3. >
My original thought is to add my reviewed-by in the order like maintainer applies the patch, but your understanding looks reasonable. Sorry for the noise.
Ping-Ke
| |