lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 1/2] ptrace,syscall_user_dispatch: Implement Syscall User Dispatch Suspension
On 01/26, Gregory Price wrote:
>
> So basic questions are:
> 1) Andrei do you think any injection occurs during quiesce that can't be
> worked around?
>
> 2) Oleg is the auto-clearing nature of the flag sufficient justification
> for keeping SUSPEND?

I understand that SUSPEND is more convenient for CRIU and more "safe".

But. This kernel is already overbloated ;) IMO, if SUSPEND is not strictly
necessary, it should be dropped.

Oleg.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:56    [W:0.104 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site