Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 24 Jan 2023 09:49:02 +0700 | | From | Bagas Sanjaya <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] module.h: Fix full name of the GPL |
| |
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 08:34:43PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
No patch description, really?
> --- > include/linux/module.h | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h > index 8c5909c0076c..329fa0b56642 100644 > --- a/include/linux/module.h > +++ b/include/linux/module.h > @@ -186,14 +186,14 @@ extern void cleanup_module(void); > * The following license idents are currently accepted as indicating free > * software modules > * > - * "GPL" [GNU Public License v2] > - * "GPL v2" [GNU Public License v2] > - * "GPL and additional rights" [GNU Public License v2 rights and more] > - * "Dual BSD/GPL" [GNU Public License v2 > + * "GPL" [GNU General Public License v2] > + * "GPL v2" [GNU General Public License v2] > + * "GPL and additional rights" [GNU General Public License v2 rights and more] > + * "Dual BSD/GPL" [GNU General Public License v2 > * or BSD license choice] > - * "Dual MIT/GPL" [GNU Public License v2 > + * "Dual MIT/GPL" [GNU General Public License v2 > * or MIT license choice] > - * "Dual MPL/GPL" [GNU Public License v2 > + * "Dual MPL/GPL" [GNU General Public License v2 > * or Mozilla license choice] > * > * The following other idents are available
Why did you do that? Maybe as justification for your other GPL name expansion fix patches?
Anyway, let's see what Linus thinks.
-- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |