lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] module.h: Fix full name of the GPL
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 08:34:43PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>

No patch description, really?

> ---
> include/linux/module.h | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> index 8c5909c0076c..329fa0b56642 100644
> --- a/include/linux/module.h
> +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> @@ -186,14 +186,14 @@ extern void cleanup_module(void);
> * The following license idents are currently accepted as indicating free
> * software modules
> *
> - * "GPL" [GNU Public License v2]
> - * "GPL v2" [GNU Public License v2]
> - * "GPL and additional rights" [GNU Public License v2 rights and more]
> - * "Dual BSD/GPL" [GNU Public License v2
> + * "GPL" [GNU General Public License v2]
> + * "GPL v2" [GNU General Public License v2]
> + * "GPL and additional rights" [GNU General Public License v2 rights and more]
> + * "Dual BSD/GPL" [GNU General Public License v2
> * or BSD license choice]
> - * "Dual MIT/GPL" [GNU Public License v2
> + * "Dual MIT/GPL" [GNU General Public License v2
> * or MIT license choice]
> - * "Dual MPL/GPL" [GNU Public License v2
> + * "Dual MPL/GPL" [GNU General Public License v2
> * or Mozilla license choice]
> *
> * The following other idents are available

Why did you do that? Maybe as justification for your other GPL name expansion
fix patches?

Anyway, let's see what Linus thinks.

--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:53    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog