lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] selftest/x86/meltdown: Add a selftest for meltdown
Hi Pavel,

Hope everything is well.

I wonder if you have missed my last email? Is it OK for me to add your
reviewed-by tag to this patch?

Thanks.

On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 04:05:52PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 10:50:44AM +0200, Pavel Boldin wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 10:18, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 09:00:21AM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > > If you do not trust what I've done is what I've claimed, now the
> > > > original author Pavel Boldin has given the patch a "LGTM" tag, does that
> > > > address your concern?
> > >
> > > I don't see that anywhere on lore.kernel.org, have a link to it?
> >
> > LGTM.
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> In Linux kernel community, reviewer normally gives a Reviewed-by tag
> when they think the patch "LGTM". And in this case, it would be a tag
> like this:
>
> Reviewed-by: Pavel Boldin <boldin.pavel@gmail.com>
>
> May I translate your "LGTM" tag to the above Reviewed-by tag?
>
> BTW, the kernel community's explanation of Reviewed-by tag is here in
> case you want to take a look:
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#reviewer-s-statement-of-oversight
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:45    [W:0.068 / U:0.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site