lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: x86: move the event handling of KVM_REQ_GET_VMCS12_PAGES into a common function
> > @@ -10700,6 +10706,12 @@ static int vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > if (kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer(vcpu))
> > kvm_inject_pending_timer_irqs(vcpu);
> >
> > + if (vcpu->arch.nested_get_pages_pending) {
> > + r = kvm_get_nested_state_pages(vcpu);
> > + if (r <= 0)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
>
> Will this leads to skip the get_nested_state_pages for L2 first time
> vmentry in every L2 running iteration ? Because with above changes
> KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES is not set in
> nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode() and
> vcpu->arch.nested_get_pages_pending is not checked in
> vcpu_enter_guest().
>
Good catch. I think the diff won't work when vcpu is runnable. It only
tries to catch the vcpu block case. Even for the vcpu block case, the
check of KVM_REQ_UNBLOCK is way too late. Ah, kvm_vcpu_check_block()
is called by kvm_vcpu_block() which is called by vcpu_block(). The
warning is triggered at the very beginning of vcpu_block(), i.e.,
within kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(). So, please ignore the trace in my
previous email.

In addition, my minor push back for that is
vcpu->arch.nested_get_pages_pending seems to be another
KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES.

Thanks.
-Mingwei


-Mingwei

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-09-07 06:27    [W:0.065 / U:0.360 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site